The relationship and pathways between resting-state EEG, physical function, and cognitive function in older adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Based on resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) evidence, this study aimed to explore the relationship and pathways between EEG-mediated physical function and cognitive function in older adults with cognitive impairment. METHODS: A total of 140 older adults with cognitive impairment were recruited, and data on their physical function, cognitive function, and EEG were collected. Pearson correlation analysis, one-way analysis of variance, linear regression analysis, and structural equation modeling analysis were conducted to explore the relationships and pathways among variables. RESULTS: FP1 theta (effect size = 0.136, 95% CI: 0.025-0.251) and T4 alpha2 (effect size = 0.140, 95% CI: 0.057-0.249) were found to significantly mediate the relationship. The direct effect (effect size = 0.866, 95% CI: 0.574-1.158) and total effect (effect size = 1.142, 95% CI: 0.848-1.435) of SPPB on MoCA were both significant. CONCLUSION: Higher physical function scores in older adults with cognitive impairment were associated with higher cognitive function scores. Left frontal theta and right temporal alpha2, as key observed indicators, may mediate the relationship between physical function and cognitive function. It is suggested to implement personalized exercise interventions based on the specific physical function of older adults, which may delay the occurrence and progression of cognitive impairment in older adults with cognitive impairment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".