MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399060752 · doi:10.29173/mlj1062

Preface

2009· article· en· W4399060752 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bryan Schwartz

Bibliographic record

VenueManitoba Law Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Systems and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

anadians witnessed a Parliamentary crisis in late 2008.It came shortly after a federal election that many Canadians viewed with boredom and indifference.The incumbent Conservative party increased its standing in the House -it ended up holding more seats in the House than did the Liberals and NDP combined and was not far from a majority.Yet the Opposition parties threatened to bring down the government on a vote of confidence.They notified the Governor General that they were prepared to organize an alternate government.The Liberals, ruling in coalition with the NDP, and propped up for at least eighteen months by the Bloc Qubcois, would lead it.Some argued that, if defeated, the Harper government had a right under constitutional convention to request dissolution of Parliament and to have that request granted by the Governor General.Others argued that the Governor General had the discretion-or even the duty-to reject a call for a second election by a defeated government that came so soon after an election that the government itself had triggered.The shock and controversy of a prospective change in government absent an election, and the potentially crucial role of the Governor General, provoked widespread public interest.The prime minister sought and obtained a prorogation of Parliament while he assembled a new budget plan.Suddenly, arcane debates over Parliamentary procedures and conventions seemed relevant, interesting, even exciting to Canadians.My view is that there would have been a profound illegitimacy to the attempted take-over by the coalition.Parliamentary tradition in Canada strongly favours the "plurality principle"-that the party with the most seats in the House of Commons has the right to form government.Having the most seats in the House-even if not a majority of them-has been recognized as crucial with respect to the right to form a government and to request dissolution of Parliament.When the Liberals led by Louis St. Laurent in 1958 and Pierre Trudeau in 1978 found themselves in second place after elections, both leaders resigned government and the Governor General invited the plurality party to rule.When the government plurality party has sought an election-even within a year of a previous election-the Governor General has granted it.The plurality principle has much to recommend it: C

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.932
Threshold uncertainty score0.950

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManitoba Law JournalSame topicPolitical Systems and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207