A computational pipeline for identifying gene targets and signalling pathways in cancer cells to improve lymphocyte infiltration and immune checkpoint therapy efficacy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are crucial for effective immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy in solid tumours. However, ∼70% of these tumours exhibit poor lymphocyte infiltration, rendering ICB therapies less effective. METHODS: We developed a bioinformatics pipeline integrating multiple previously unconsidered factors or datasets, including tumour cell immune-related pathways, copy number variation (CNV), and single tumour cell sequencing data, as well as tumour mRNA-seq data and patient survival data, to identify targets that can potentially improve T cell infiltration and enhance ICB efficacy. Furthermore, we conducted wet-lab experiments and successfully validated one of the top-identified genes. FINDINGS: We applied this pipeline in solid tumours of the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and identified a set of genes in 18 cancer types that might potentially improve lymphocyte infiltration and ICB efficacy, providing a valuable drug target resource to be further explored. Importantly, we experimentally validated SUN1, which had not been linked to T cell infiltration and ICB therapy previously, but was one of the top-identified gene targets among 3 cancer types based on the pipeline, in a mouse colon cancer syngeneic model. We showed that Sun1 KO could significantly enhance antigen presentation, increase T-cell infiltration, and improve anti-PD1 treatment efficacy. Moreover, with a single-cell multiome analysis, we identified subgene regulatory networks (sub-GRNs) showing Stat proteins play important roles in enhancing the immune-related pathways in Sun1-KO cancer cells. INTERPRETATION: This study not only established a computational pipeline for discovering new gene targets and signalling pathways in cancer cells that block T-cell infiltration, but also provided a gene target pool for further exploration in improving lymphocyte infiltration and ICB efficacy in solid tumours. FUNDING: A full list of funding bodies that contributed to this study can be found in the Acknowledgements section.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".