Mechanisms and Site Selectivity of (Het)Ar–X Oxidative Addition to Pd(0) Are Controlled by Frontier Molecular Orbital Symmetry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report how the reaction mechanism and site-selectivity of 2-halopyridine oxidative addition to L2Pd(0) are both controlled by frontier molecular orbital symmetry. Comparing oxidative addition rates for pairs of 2-chloro-3-EDG-pyridines / 2-chloro-5-EDG-pyridines (EDG = electron-donating group: NH2, OMe and F) to Pd(PCy3)2 reveals the 3-EDG isomers undergo oxidative addition ~100 times faster than their 5-EDG counterparts (∆ΔG‡OA = 10.4-11.6 kJ mol-1). Experimental and computational mechanistic studies reveal that the LUMO symmetries of the substrates control the oxidative addition mechanism. For the 3-EDG derivatives, high LUMO orbital coefficients at the reactive C2 position, and antibonding LUMO symmetry through the C2=N bond of the pyridine lead to a nucleophilic displacement oxida-tive addition mechanism. Conversely, the LUMO of the 5-EDG derivatives has a node through the C5–C2 plane, lead-ing to minimal orbital contribution at the reactive carbon. The higher energy LUMO+1 has substantial density at C2, but minimal orbital density at the nitrogen. This leads to 5-EDG substrates undergoing a 3-centered insertion oxida-tive addition mechanism. These orbital symmetry effects also control site-selectivity for multihalogenated pyridines, which we investigate for both electron-donating and electron-withdrawing substituents. Incorporating simple fron-tier orbital based molecular descriptors to a quantitative multivariate linear model for oxidative addition leads to im-proved prediction accuracy for both relative rates and site-selectivity of substituted 2-halopyridine oxidative addition to L2Pd(0).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".