ACTH-dependent Cushing Syndrome with No Peripheral Response But a Marked Petrosal Sinus ACTH Response to Desmopressin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Desmopressin is increasingly used for the diagnosis of Cushing disease (CD) since corticotropin-releasing hormone became unavailable. We report the case a 32-year-old man who presented with overt Cushing syndrome. Morning blood cortisol, ACTH, 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test, 24-hour urinary free cortisol, and bedtime salivary cortisol were highly variable, reaching markedly elevated values. Intravenous desmopressin administration produced no ACTH or cortisol increase. Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging, thoracic computed tomography, and DOTATATE positron emission tomography scan identified no lesion. Inferior petrosal sinus sampling (IPSS) with desmopressin stimulation resulted in elevated central-to-peripheral ACTH ratio and prolactin co-secretion, while peripheral ACTH remained stable. No corticotroph tumor was identified on pituitary surgery pathology. Hypercortisolism persisted postoperatively. Cabergoline was initiated, after which the patient rapidly developed transient severe adrenal insufficiency (AI). Bilateral adrenalectomy was performed in view of persistent hypercortisolism. This is an unusual case of petrosal sinus ACTH response to desmopressin without any peripheral response, suggesting a central source of ACTH. Thus, desmopressin should still be used during IPSS in patients with no peripheral response. It is unclear whether the AI episode resulted from a combination of nadir of cyclic hypercortisolism, partial apoplexy, and response to cabergoline of an occult corticotroph tumor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".