MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

PARPi eligibility amongst women with newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer enrolled in the GREAT universal genetic testing study.

2024· article· en· W4399121924 on OpenAlexaff
Stephanie M. Wong, Zoulikha Rezoug, Stephanie Totten, David Szlachtycz, Adrienne Atayan, Kristen Mohler, Sophie Albert, Leila Feng, Brianna Lemieux Anglin, Zhen Shen, Nancy Hamel, Nicholas Meti, Khashayar Esfahani, D. L. Anderson, Jean-François Boileau, Ipshita Prakash, Mark Basik, Sarkis Meterissian, George Chong, William D. Foulkes

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMcGill UniversitySt Mary's Hospital CentreJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGenetic testingBreast cancerOncologyCancerInternal medicineGynecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

531 Background: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are approved for the treatment of BRCA-associated metastatic and high-risk early breast cancer. Recent guidelines have endorsed the use of BRCA1/2 testing for all patients with breast cancer who may be eligible for PARPi therapy, however it is unclear what proportion of patients are impacted by these recommendations. Methods: We sought to evaluate pre-test and post-test eligibility for PARPi in women aged >18 years old with a first diagnosis of stage I-IV invasive breast cancer who enrolled in a prospective, multicentered universal genetic testing study between 2019-2022. All enrolled patients underwent pre-test counselling and an obligatory primary panel of BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 at the time of diagnosis. Candidacy for PARPi was determined by biologic subtype, clinical stage, pathologic stage, and/or response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Results: Of 1017 patients referred for the study, 805 were eligible and 729 (90.6%) consented to participate. The median age at diagnosis was 53 years (IQR, 45-62 years) and 96.2% had stage I-III disease. Overall, 32 (4.4%) patients had a germline pathogenic variant (GPV) in BRCA1/2, and 7 (1.0%) had a GPV in PALB2. Of 112 (15.4%) patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), 19.6% had a GPV in BRCA1/2 or PALB2, whereas in 487 (66.8%) with ER+HER2- disease, 2.9% had a GPV (p<0.001). Among the 112 patients with TNBC, 64 (57%) were candidates for PARPi pre-genetic testing, and 12 (10.7%) remained eligible due to a GPV in BRCA1/2. Among the 487 patients with ER+HER2- breast cancer, 37 (5.1%) were candidates for PARPi pre-genetic testing, and 1 (0.2%) remained eligible due to a BRCA1 GPV identified on testing. All patients who were PARPi eligible were <65 years of age or >65 years with TNBC. Conclusions: In women with newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer, approximately 14% are candidates for PARPi prior to genetic testing, and 1.8% remain PARPi eligible due to a confirmed pathogenic variant in BRCA1/2. Consequently, genetic testing impacts systemic therapy decisions for PARPi in 10% of TNBC patients and fewer than 1% of women with ER+HER2- breast cancer. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicPARP inhibition in cancer therapy→French-language works237,207→