Cervical spine changes with functional appliance treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cervical spine posture is related to craniofacial morphology, airway, gait and body posture. This posture may be influenced by the changes in the mandibular position brought about by functional appliance therapy. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to assess the changes in the cervical spine posture with functional appliance treatment in Skeletal Class II subjects. A search of studies in six electronic databases - Medline (via Pubmed), the Cochrane Library, OVID, LILACS, Scopus and Web of Science were performed until January 18, 2024 without any restriction in date or language of publication. Eligibility screening, study selection, and data extraction were performed by two reviewers independently. The risk of bias assessment of the included studies was performed with the Newcastle Ottawa scale and Cochrane RoB 2.0. Meta-analysis was performed using random effects model for assessment of changes in the cervical spine with removable and fixed functional appliances. Twelve articles that satisfied the eligibility criteria were included for systematic review and nine articles for meta-analysis. Five studies showed a low risk of bias, one as moderate and six as high risk of bias. GRADE assessment revealed a low quality evidence. Meta-analysis revealed a decrease of the upper cervical inclination by 1.16° (95 % CI of −2.68 to 0.35, I2 = 6 %), an increase of the middle cervical inclination by 2.20° (95 % CI of 0.46–3.94, I2 = 49 %), an increase in cervical curvature angle by 1.60° (95 % CI of 0.12–3.09, I2 = 89 %) and a decrease in cervical lordosis angle by 1.54° (95 % CI of −4.16 to 1.08, I2 = 0 %). Minimal uprighting of the cervical spine was noted with functional appliances. Fixed functional appliances exerted a greater effect than removable functional appliances. Cervical hyperlordosis was reduced with removable functional appliance treatment. Though these changes are minimal, the clinical orthodontist should be aware that functional therapy also influences cervical spine posture. Due to the heterogeneity and low quality of evidence, the results are to be considered critically.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".