MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Normal and Resilient Mode FPGA-based Access Gateway Function Through P4-generated RTL

2024· article· en· W4399141807 on OpenAlexafffund
Mostafa Abbasmollaei, Tarek Ould‐Bachir, Yvon Savaria

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceForwarding planeField-programmable gate arrayNetwork packetComputer networkEmbedded systemPacket processingResidential gateway

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Customizing packet processing is crucial in the evolving network landscape, especially with the rise of 5G telecommunications and beyond. Software-Defined Networking and programmable data planes, powered by the P4 language and FPGA-based platforms, offer dynamic network customization that can be used to implement resilient networks. With their high performance and programmability, FPGAs present cost-effective alternatives for diverse network applications, including offloading packet processing from servers. This paper introduces a configurable FPGA-based data plane implementing the Access Gateway Function (AGF). It offers a resilient operating mode to enhance network reliability and availability. The paper leverages the P4 language and the VitisNetP4 Intellectual Property to create RTL streams, enabling AGF on a pure FPGA target. The reported experimental results demonstrate that the proposed architecture can support 50K user flows with a resource utilization lower than 15% of that available in an Ultrascale+ FPGA (xcu280-fsvh2892-21-e). This leaves massive logic resources available to incorporate fault mitigation techniques and spare streams needed to enhance resiliency. Moreover, the presented workflow maintains an average latency of approximately 9 microseconds for each downstream or upstream packet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.942
Threshold uncertainty score0.771

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207