MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Joint Optimization of UAV Trajectory and User Scheduling in Intelligent Reflecting Surface- Aided Systems with Interfering Nodes

2023· article· en· W4399154637 on OpenAlexaff
Jianqiang Lin, Ahmed A. Al-Habob, Yindi Jing, Octavia A. Dobre

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTelecommunications linkScheduling (production processes)Base stationMathematical optimizationOptimization problemRelayConvex optimizationWirelessAlgorithmRegular polygonMathematicsComputer networkTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper focuses on maximizing the aggregate throughput in a downlink wireless communication system. The system involves collaboration between an unmanned aerial vehi-cle (UAV) and an intelligent reflecting surface (IRS) acting as a mobile relay between the base stations (BSs) and a set of users. The goal is to optimize the reflecting matrix of the IRS, user scheduling, and UAV trajectory to maintain strong links between the users and the serving BS while suppressing interference from other nodes. Depending on whether the amplitudes of reflecting elements are fixed, we consider both ideal and non-ideal IRS scenarios. To address the mixed-integer non-convex optimization problem with coupled variables, the original problem is decom-posed into three sub-problems, and an alternating optimization algorithm is developed. For the ideal IRS case, the successive convex approximation (SCA) technique is employed to transform the problem into a convex one. In the non-ideal case, a novel algorithm utilizing the direction matrix is proposed to achieve a rank-one solution. Simulation results demonstrate the rapid convergence and improved sum rate performance of the proposed algorithm compared to traditional schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.360
Threshold uncertainty score0.403

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207