MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399157569 · doi:10.18280/mmep.110525

Robust Estimation Based on Lognormal Kriging Technique for Some Soil Data

2024· article· en· W4399157569 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLog-normal distributionKrigingEstimationStatisticsComputer scienceMathematicsEconometricsEnvironmental scienceSoil scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper dealt with the study of the analysis and interpretation of spatial variability using the Kriging technique in geostatistics.The objectives of this work are; to interpolate the values of regionalized variables; to express the spatial variation after using the logarithmic transformed for the original scale; observations for two groups of soil data; To reduce the level of pollution in the soil by studying the characteristics of the estimates.The ordinary kriging procedure is used to estimate the best linear unbiased estimator.The experimental semi-variogram function is applied as a tool to give the idea of spatial distribution after using the logarithmic transformations of the origin data.This method assumes the isotropy.Also, a robust estimate (Matheron's and Haslett's, Cressie-Hawkins) was applied to minimize some prediction scores.Data adopted in this work is taken from Mosul city in Iraq, for some soil spatial real data.Each data contains (100) real soil data of (PH) and (NO3).Our finding results illustrate the variance is itself for all directions of the compass: East-west, North-south, Northeast, and Northwest.The model describes (94%) nearest the Gaussian model of (PH), and (92%) nearest the spherical model of the total variability of (NO3) after comparing the results models between the original scale and the lognormal data by obtain the fitting model of soil data with the formulas of kriging.In conclusion, we show the qualities of the estimation rely on the ratio distances.Behaviors of continues of the phenomenon or observations and low coefficient of variation, which leads to improved efficiency in spatial distribution The support of results show that Matheron's and Haslett's robust estimators had better performance than Cressie Hawkins's robust soil data comparison with the curves of variogram function, because the small effect of outlier values on the estimates it is clear from this effect that pollution may be large by correctly knowing the weight restrictions for the level of pollution, and reducing the level of pollution depends practically and for a long period on the stationarity of some estimates.All computations are carried out in Matlab language.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.836

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.188
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it