MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399176797 · doi:10.1080/21678421.2024.2359559

Factors affecting anticipatory grief of family carers supporting people living with Motor Neurone disease: the impact of disease symptomatology

2024· article· en· W4399176797 on OpenAlexaff
Ana Paula Trucco, Mizanur Khondoker, Naoko Kishita, Tamara Backhouse, Helen Copsey, Eneida Mioshi

Bibliographic record

VenueAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity Hospital Foundation
FundersAlzheimer’s SocietyMotor Neurone Disease AssociationDepartment of Health and Social CareNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchAlzheimer's SocietyMND Scotland
KeywordsMotor neurone diseaseDiseaseGriefPsychologyClinical psychologyGerontologyPsychiatryDevelopmental psychologyMedicineAmyotrophic lateral sclerosisInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To investigate the effect of carer- and disease-related factors on anticipatory grief (AG) in family carers supporting people living with Motor Neurone Disease.Methods Seventy-five carers from the UK and USA participated in this cross-sectional study, between July 2021 and February 2023. Participants completed assessments on: anticipatory grief (MMCGI-SF, comprising three sub-scales: Personal Sacrifice Burden, Heartfelt Sadness and Longing, Worry and Felt Isolation); person with MND (pwMND) behavioral changes (MiND-B) and disease severity (ALSFRS-R); carer-pwMND emotional bond (Relationship Closeness Scale), familism levels (Familism Scale), and reported hours of care provided. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to explore factors impacting carer AG.Results AG total scores showed that 50.7% of carers were experiencing common grieving reactions, 22.6% presented intense grieving emotions, and 26.7% presented low grieving responses.Disease severity (regression coefficient, β = −0.31, p = 0.01, 95%CI −0.91 to −0.13) and behavioral changes (β = −0.34, p = 0.002, 95%CI −1.45 to −0.33) predicted AG total scores (proportion of explained variation, R2=0.38, p < 0.001).Regarding AG subscales, Personal Sacrifice Burden (R2=0.43, p < 0.001) was predicted by disease severity (β = −0.39, p < 0.001, 95%CI −0.42 to −0.11). Behavioral changes predicted Heartfelt Sadness and Longing (β = −0.27, p = 0.03, 95%CI −0.49 to −0.03; R2 = 0.21, p = 0.01) and Worry and Felt Isolation (β = −0.42, p < 0.001, 95%CI −0.63 to −0.20; R2=0.33, p < 0.001).Conclusion This study suggests that disease-related factors may be the strongest predictors of carer AG. Interventions addressing carers’ understanding and management of MND symptoms seem crucial to support their experiences of loss and their acceptance of MND. Evidence-based support for carers in MND services is required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal DegenerationSame topicAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchFrench-language works237,207