MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399200287 · doi:10.1093/nutrit/nuae063

Prevalence and Determinants of Stunting-Anemia and Wasting-Anemia Comorbidities and Micronutrient Deficiencies in Children Under 5 in the Least-Developed Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2024· review· en· W4399200287 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jinhu Li, Son Nghiem, Tinh Doan

Bibliographic record

VenueNutrition Reviews · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicChild Nutrition and Water Access
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWastingMicronutrientAnemiaMeta-analysisMedicineMicronutrient deficiencyMalnutritionWasting SyndromeEnvironmental healthPediatricsInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CONTEXT: Despite shifting from addressing isolated forms of malnutrition to recognizing its multifaceted nature, evidence on the prevalence and determinants of micronutrient deficiencies, and their coexistence with undernutrition in children under 5, remains insufficient, unsystematic, and incohesive. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the prevalence and determinants of stunting-anemia and wasting-anemia comorbidities and micronutrient deficiencies in children under 5 in the least-developed countries (LDCs). DATA SOURCES: Electronic searches took place from January 15, 2023, to February 14, 2024, across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, SCOPUS, African Index Medicus (AIM), World Health Organization's Institutional Repository for Information Sharing (IRIS), and African Journals Online. The search spanned the years 2000 to 2024, yet it yielded eligible full-text English research articles from only 2005 to 2021 conducted in LDCs. Studies lacking quantitative data on malnutrition types and their determinants were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent authors assessed articles for bias and quality using Hoy et al's 10-item scale and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) criteria. Prevalence and other details were extracted using a Joanna Briggs Institute Excel template. Authors extracted adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for determinant factors such as sex and vitamin A and iron supplementation. DATA ANALYSIS: The search yielded 6248 articles from 46 LDCs. Sixty-nine articles, with a total sample size of 181 605, met inclusion criteria for the final meta-analysis. Vitamin A deficiency affected 16.32% of children, and iodine deficiency affected 43.41% of children. The pooled prevalence of wasting-anemia and stunting-anemia comorbidity was 5.44% and 19.47%, respectively. Stunting was associated with vitamin A deficiency (aOR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.01-2.37), and not taking vitamin A supplementation was associated with iron-deficiency anemia (aOR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.21-1.55). CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of children under 5 in LDCs experienced stunting-anemia and wasting-anemia comorbidities and micronutrient deficiencies. This study underscores the urgent need to address factors driving these burdens. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42023409483.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.497
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNutrition ReviewsSame topicChild Nutrition and Water AccessFrench-language works237,207