Spin-Polarized Conceptual Density Functional Theory from the Convex Hull
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a new, nonarbitrary, internally consistent, and unambiguous framework for spin-polarized conceptual density-functional theory (SP-DFT). We explicitly characterize the convex hull of energy, as a function of the number of electrons and their spin, as the only accessible ground states in spin-polarized density functional theory. Then, we construct continuous linear and quadratic models for the energy. The nondifferentiable linear model exactly captures the simplicial geometry of the complex hull about the point of interest and gives exact representations for the conceptual DFT reactivity indicators. The continuous quadratic energy model is the paraboloid of maximum curvature, which most tightly encloses the point of interest and neighboring vertices. The quadratic model is invariant to the choice of coordinate system (i.e., { N, S } vs { N α, N β }) and reduces to a sensible formulation of spin-free conceptual DFT in the appropriate limit. Using the quadratic model, we generalize the Parr functions { P + ( r ), P – ( r )} (and their derivatives with respect to number of electrons) to this new spin-polarized framework, integrating the Parr function concept into the context of (spin-polarized) conceptual DFT, and extending it to include higher-order effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".