MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399214370 · doi:10.2340/17453674.2024.40709

Guideline for RSA and CT-RSA implant migration measurements: an update of standardizations and recommendations

2024· article· en· W4399214370 on OpenAlexaff
Bart L. Kaptein, Bart G. Pijls, Lennard A. Koster, Johan Kärrholm, Maury L. Hull, Abby Niesen, Petra J. C. Heesterbeek, Stuart A. Callary, Matthew G. Teeter, Trevor C. Gascoyne, Stephan M. Röhrl, Gunnar Flivik, Laura Bragonzoni, Elise Laende, Olof Sandberg, Lucian B. Solomon, Rob G. H. H. Nelissen, Maiken Stilling

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Orthopaedica · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityOrthopaedic Innovation CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGuidelineChecklistPresentation (obstetrics)Medical physicsSurgeryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Opening remarks: These guidelines are the result of discussions within a diverse group of RSA researchers. They were approved in December 2023 by the board and selected members of the International Radiostereometry Society to update the guidelines by Valstar et al. [1]. By adhering to these guidelines, RSA studies will become more transparent and consistent in execution, presentation, reporting, and interpretation. Both authors and reviewers of scientific papers using RSA may use these guidelines, summarized in the Checklist, as a reference. Deviations from these guidelines should have the underlying rationale stated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.058
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.149
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.305

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0580.149
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.005
Bibliometrics0.0130.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0110.005
Research integrity0.0120.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa OrthopaedicaSame topicAdvanced X-ray and CT ImagingFrench-language works237,207