THE PUBLIC HOME WATER SERVICE. ANALYSIS OF LAW NO. 124 AND ITS REGULATIONS IN THE CUBAN LEGAL SYSTEM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article analyzes from a holistic perspective the theoretical and legislative references of the domestic public service from the Administrative Law of Water from comparative law, with emphasis on how the Cuban legislator regulated it in the water regulations, Law No. 124, that allows determining the impact of this non-compliance on the legislative gaps in the legal system studied.Theoretical and empirical methods, as well as techniques and procedures of scientific research, the doctrinal theoretical analysis of the categories involved in the delimitation of legislative gaps were used for its construction, based on the most representative theoretical references to conclude.As in the Cuban legal system, the public home service is protected, as other laws provide to follow the legal logic.That of analysis and synthesis, to systematize the main elements studied; comparative law, to know the regulatory treatment of the domestic public water service.The bibliographic review, to know the criteria of scholars on the subject.Results: the identification of legislative gaps in the aforementioned legal norm is provided and the omission of not regulating the public home service in the legal norms in the Cuban legal system is noted as an idea to defend in an
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".