MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399240624 · doi:10.53373/reds.2024.64.3.0169

THE MSMES. ANALYSIS FROM CORPORATE LAW, CUBAN REALITY

2024· article· fr· W4399240624 on OpenAlexaff
Alcides Francisco Antúnez Sánchez, Albert Noguera Fernández, Magno Federici Gomes

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue Européenne du Droit Social · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicComparative International Legal Studies
Canadian institutionsCegep de Sept Iles
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorporate lawBusinessLaw and economicsPolitical scienceLawEconomicsCorporate governance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article carries out an analysis of the private entrepreneur and its conversion as a Limited Liability Company in Corporate Law, how it has been introduced into the Cuban legal system from its origins, characteristics as a new economic actor, elements that distinguish MSMEs , legal nature, social order conceived for the execution of commercial activities in joint trade acts with the public company, mandated from the constitutional text of 2019, in the update of the new Cuban social economic model.The methods used were the analysis, synthesis of materials from Commercial Law to break down the information, the logical history of the stages of Corporate Law of the SRL, induction deduction to deduce and arrive at elements of value judgments, the legal exegetical, the bibliographic review of materials on MSMEs, and the legal comparison of legal norms on the constitutive process of the commercial company.The analysis of the normative regulation of the MIPYMES in Cuba, as an actor in the productive development for its contribution to the generation of jobs, in the number of companies and, for its weight in the GDP of the country.Required preferential tax treatment, facilities for access to financial credit by the Bank, entities that oversee its development and promotion, that regulate the diversity of legal forms that they adopt as businesses in the legal system such as SRL, SURL or SL in attention to the Commercial Code and substantive law, and the need to issue a Business Law, which sets out the boundaries and demarcations with the public company.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.203
Threshold uncertainty score0.403

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0070.006
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue Européenne du Droit SocialSame topicComparative International Legal StudiesFrench-language works237,207