<i>In Situ</i> Sulfur Isotope Geochemistry Using Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry of Sulfides in the ABM Replacement-Style Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide Deposit, Finlayson Lake District, Yukon, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The ABM deposit is a bimodal-felsic, replacement-style volcanogenic massive sulfide deposit located in the Finlayson Lake district, Yukon, Canada, that is hosted by back-arc-affinity felsic volcanic rocks of the Yukon-Tanana terrane. Massive sulfide mineralization occurs as a series of stacked and stratabound lenses subparallel to the volcanic stratigraphy, surrounded by an envelope of pervasive white mica and chlorite alteration. Three major mineral assemblages occur: (1) a pyrite-sphalerite assemblage enriched in Zn-Pb-As-Sb-Ag-Au that formed at temperatures ∼200–270 °C, (2) a pyrite-chalcopyrite-magnetite-pyrrhotite assemblage enriched in Cu-Bi-Se-Co that formed at temperatures ∼300–350 °C, and (3) a chalcopyrite-pyrrhotite-pyrite stringer assemblage formed at temperatures >300 °C. In situ analysis of the sulfur isotopic ratios (δ34S) using secondary ion mass spectrometry has been performed on sulfides (pyrite, pyrrhotite, chalcopyrite, galena, and arsenopyrite) from samples representative of the major mineral assemblages. The δ34S results range between +4.0 and +12.5‰. The pyrite-sphalerite assemblage has an average δ34S value of +6.6 ± 1.8‰ (n = 31), whereas the higher temperature assemblages have an average δ34S value of +9.9 ± 1.4‰ (n = 59). Examination of the δ34S values of adjacent mineral pairs shows that the sulfides were formed under disequilibrium conditions and were not significantly altered or re-equilibrated by greenschist facies metamorphism that affected the ABM deposit post-volcanogenic massive sulfide formation. The observed range of δ34S values suggests that H2S derived from thermochemical sulfate reduction of seawater sulfate and/or an igneous sulfur source as the likeliest sources of S for the sulfides in the ABM deposit. Modeling of thermochemical sulfate reduction of contemporaneous Late Devonian seawater sulfate (δ34S ∼ +25‰) at temperatures estimated for the fluids forming the ABM deposit mineral assemblages (200–350 °C) shows that the reduction of 5–30% of the seawater sulfate would result in isotopic signatures similar to those observed at the ABM deposit. This model also explains the distribution of δ34S values across the mineral assemblages, as thermochemical sulfate reduction at higher temperatures (350 °C) results in more isotopically positive δ34S values. Modeling of mixing lines between thermochemical sulfate reduction at different temperatures and an igneous sulfur source suggests that leaching of magmatic/volcanic rocks also acted as a source of sulfur and was a likely a major contributor (70–95%) to the hydrothermal fluid system at the ABM deposit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".