MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

New Guidelines for PE VQ Scanning

2024· article· en· W4399265221 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEmergency Medicine News · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear Physics and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Figure: PE, pulmonary embolism, VQ, scanning, Canadian Association of Nuclear Medicine, D-dimer, SPECT, CTPA, ventilationBy EMedHome.com The Canadian Association of Nuclear Medicine recently released best practice guidelines for VQ scanning in pulmonary embolism. (J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2024;55[1]:158; https://tinyurl.com/mwja5hwb.) These recommendations provide a concise, updated summary of key aspects of diagnosing acute PE. D-dimer has high sensitivity but low specificity for PE, and it is not needed if the pretest probability for PE is other than low. A negative D-dimer has a high negative predictive value. A ventilation/perfusion SPECT nuclear medicine scan has at least the same or better accuracy for PE as CTPA, but it has a much lower radiation dose, especially for breast exposure. A fetal dose is roughly equivalent for V/P SPECT and MD-CTPA. A breast dose is much higher with MD-CTPA than V/P SPECT. Consider V/P SPECT for children and pregnant women as the first investigation for suspected PE due to better sensitivity, lower radiation, and no adverse reactions. A perfusion-only study might suffice, with an optional ventilation study the next day if needed, because ventilation co-morbidities are unlikely. V/P SPECT should be used in pregnant women with comorbidities or a history of smoking. Interpretation in probabilistic terms is not appropriate and must be avoided. All exams should be interpreted as either PE present or PE absent or using clear terms. PE is diagnosed when at least one lobar or segmental vascular type mismatched defect (perfusion defect with preserved ventilation) or two subsegmental vascular mismatches is present, regardless of other findings. PE is excluded when perfusion is normal or if there are only matched defects (regardless of morphology), nonvascular mismatches, or reverse mismatches (perfusion preserved but ventilation absent). This clinical pearl first appeared on www.EMedHome.com. Subscribers receive a new clinical pearl by email every Wednesday. Visit our website for videos from emergency medicine experts (http://tinyurl.com/EMedHomeVideos) and podcasts from Amal Mattu, MD, and other noted emergency physicians from EMedHome.com (http://tinyurl.com/MattuEMCast). EMedHome.com on EM-News.com This Month's Video W. Gannon Sungar, DO: Strangulation Injuries: http://tinyurl.com/EMedHomeVideos. Dr. Sungar is an associate program director at the Denver Health Residency in Emergency Medicine and an assistant professor of emergency medicine at the University of Colorado School of Medicine in Aurora, CO. This Month's Podcast Amal Mattu, MD, and colleagues: AHA Updates on Adult ACLS and Pulmonary Embolism: http://tinyurl.com/MattuEMCast. Dr. Mattu is one of the premier speakers in emergency medicine and a professor of emergency medicine and the vice chair of emergency medicine at the University of Maryland School of Medicine in Baltimore.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.615
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEmergency Medicine NewsSame topicNuclear Physics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207