MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399269962 · doi:10.61838/kman.jppr.1.3.2

The Impact of Dialectical Behavior Therapy in Reducing Emotional Exhaustion and Enhancing Empathy

2023· article· en· W4399269962 on OpenAlexaff
Farzaneh Mardani, Nancy Parra Vázquez, Seyed Milad Saadati

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Personality and Psychosomatic Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild Therapy and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmpathyDialectical behavior therapyPsychologyEmotional exhaustionDialecticPsychotherapistClinical psychologySocial psychologyBurnout

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) in reducing emotional exhaustion and enhancing empathy among participants. This randomized controlled trial included 30 participants, randomly assigned to either the DBT intervention group or a control group, with 15 participants in each group. The intervention group underwent eight 75-minute DBT sessions over three months, while the control group received no intervention. Emotional exhaustion and empathy were measured at baseline, post-intervention, and at a three-month follow-up using the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), respectively. Data analysis was conducted using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measurements and the Bonferroni post-hoc test, with statistical analyses performed using SPSS-27. The intervention group showed a significant reduction in emotional exhaustion from a baseline mean of 45.23 (SD = 8.21) to 32.56 (SD = 7.45) post-intervention and 34.12 (SD = 7.89) at follow-up. In contrast, the control group's emotional exhaustion remained relatively stable (baseline: 44.87, SD = 7.98; post-intervention: 44.12, SD = 7.89; follow-up: 45.23, SD = 8.12). Empathy scores in the intervention group increased significantly from 52.34 (SD = 9.12) at baseline to 60.23 (SD = 8.45) post-intervention, with a slight decrease to 58.56 (SD = 8.76) at follow-up. The control group showed minimal changes in empathy (baseline: 51.67, SD = 8.89; post-intervention: 52.34, SD = 8.56; follow-up: 51.23, SD = 8.67). ANOVA results confirmed the significance of these changes (F = 31.15, p < 0.001), with Bonferroni post-hoc tests indicating significant differences between baseline and subsequent time points in the intervention group (p < 0.001). The study demonstrates that DBT is significantly effective in reducing emotional exhaustion and enhancing empathy among participants. These findings suggest that DBT can be a valuable intervention for improving psychological resilience and interpersonal effectiveness, particularly in populations at risk for burnout and empathic distress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.414
Threshold uncertainty score0.304

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.152
GPT teacher head0.490
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Personality and Psychosomatic ResearchSame topicChild Therapy and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207