MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399270082 · doi:10.61838/kman.jppr.1.4.4

Influence of Perceived Control on Health Outcomes in Chronic Disease Patients

2023· article· en· W4399270082 on OpenAlexaff
Erwin A. William, Amos Magut, Seyed Amir Saadati

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Personality and Psychosomatic Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Wellbeing Research
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerceived controlChronic diseaseControl (management)DiseaseMedicineEnvironmental healthPsychologyFamily medicineSocial psychologyInternal medicineComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aimed to explore the influence of perceived control on health outcomes among chronic disease patients. By understanding how perceived control affects psychological well-being, health-related behaviors, and social interactions, the research sought to provide insights into improving chronic disease management. A qualitative research design was employed, utilizing semi-structured interviews to gather in-depth data from 20 participants diagnosed with various chronic diseases, including diabetes, hypertension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Participants were selected through purposive sampling to ensure diverse representation. Data collection continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed using NVivo software, following a thematic analysis approach to identify key themes and patterns. The study identified three main themes: psychological impact, behavioral impact, and social impact of perceived control. Participants who reported higher perceived control experienced lower stress and anxiety, higher emotional resilience, and better self-efficacy. Health-related behaviors such as medication adherence and regular health monitoring were positively influenced by perceived control. Social support from family, friends, and healthcare providers also played a crucial role in enhancing perceived control. For instance, 75% of participants indicated that a strong support network improved their ability to manage their disease, and 65% noted better health outcomes due to effective communication with healthcare providers. The findings underscore the significant impact of perceived control on the health outcomes of chronic disease patients. Enhancing perceived control through health literacy, social support, and integrated care can lead to improved psychological well-being, healthier behaviors, and better health outcomes. Future research should focus on larger, more diverse samples and longitudinal studies to further explore these relationships. Practical implications include developing educational interventions and support systems to foster a greater sense of control among chronic disease patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.715

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.150
GPT teacher head0.552
Teacher spread0.402 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Personality and Psychosomatic ResearchSame topicHealth and Wellbeing ResearchFrench-language works237,207