Severe Features of Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical features of patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) who subsequently developed systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with CHD and sJIA at our institution. Detailed clinical, laboratory, and radiographic data were collected from the medical record and reviewed with each patient's primary medical team. RESULTS: Five patients with sJIA and CHD were identified. Each child had a unique cardiac anatomy, but all the patients required surgical repair during the first year of life. Four children had thymectomies at the time of cardiac surgery. Classic signs of sJIA such as fever (n = 5), rash (n = 5), and arthritis (n = 4) developed after surgical intervention in all the patients. The individuals in this cohort displayed risk factors associated with severe sJIA, including disease onset before 2 years of age (n = 5), elevated interleukin 18 levels (n = 5), baseline eosinophilia prior to initiation of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (n = 4), and positivity for HLA-DRB1*15:01 alleles (n = 4). Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) occurred in 3 patients and sJIA-associated lung disease (sJIA-LD) was identified in 4 patients. Two children died from complications of their cardiac and/or pulmonary disease. CONCLUSION: We identified an association between CHD and severe forms of sJIA. Although these findings will need to be confirmed in larger, multicenter cohorts, the results highlight the importance of considering a diagnosis of sJIA in children with CHD and remaining vigilant for complications such as MAS and sJIA-LD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".