Access for adolescents and young adults with hard-to-cure cancer to PROFYLE: The pan-Canadian precision oncology pipeline.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
10012 Background: Cancer is the most common cause of disease-related death in children, adolescents and young adults (CAYA). Approximately, 1.5% of patients with cancer in Canada are adolescents and young adults (AYAs) (age 15-29). AYAs often present with advanced disease and limited access to clinical trials including genomic testing. The PRecision Oncology For Young peopLE (PROFYLE) national, collaborative program, was created to provide equitable access to molecular profiling to identify novel targeted treatment options for CAYA with hard-to-cure cancers. The AYA node of PROFYLE aims to enhance the inclusion of AYAs across Canada at pediatric and adult centers while raising awareness of improving cancer outcomes of this underserved population. Methods: Building upon 3 pre-existing regional precision oncology programs, PROFYLE was implemented as the first pan-Canadian precision oncology pipeline. The PROFYLE study is multi-centred, non-randomized, interventional, and qualitative. Inclusion criteria: ≤29y; treatment at a Canadian center; diagnosis of a hard-to-cure cancer. It includes genomic and transcriptomic sequencing of paired germline and cancer fresh/frozen samples. Actionable findings, potential targeted therapy options including available clinical trials, clarification of diagnosis, and genetic counseling recommendations are provided to the clinical care team. Results: To date, > 1,200 CAYA are included from all provinces. Of these, 33% were AYAs. Cancer diagnoses included: 47% sarcoma, 15% leukemia/lymphoma, 13% CNS tumor, 25% other. Of the AYAs enrolled, 53% had ≥1 significant tumour profiling finding (48% specific mutations/fusions; 6% DNA repair defect signature, hypermutation, microsatellite instability, chromosomal instability; 3% predictors of therapeutic resistance; 5% outliers in gene expression). 71% had potentially useful findings (15% diagnostic; 9% prognostic; 59% therapeutic; 2% etiologic; 15% cancer predisposition; 2% secondary germline; 0.5% pharmacogenetic). 23% had a pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variant. 60% had ≥1 potentially actionable somatic alteration. 64% of clinicians indicated that molecular findings impacted clinical management (12% diagnostic; 6% prognostic, 60% therapeutic; 16% germline genetic). 24% indicated a change in treatment planning in response to these findings. Conclusions: The goal of developing a national precision oncology pipeline that provides equitable access to molecular profiling in a clinically relevant timeframe has been realized through the establishment of PROFYLE. Findings demonstrate that the sequencing platform provided medically informative results in the majority of enrolled AYAs. The success of PROFYLE underscores the importance of the continuing efforts to increase the access to this precision oncology initiative for all AYAs with cancer in Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".