Assessment Methods and Intervention Strategies for Cleft-Related Lateral Misarticulation in Chinese-Speaking Children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyze the characteristics and error speech features of cleft-related lateral misarticulation and provide a basis for clinical evaluation and rational intervention. Participants who were diagnosed with lateral misarticulation after cleft palate repairment were 126 children aged 4, 6 to 16, and 11, and they had complete palatopharyngeal closure, no abnormalities in their speech organs and occlusion, and no hearing or intellectual impairments. The Chinese standard pronunciation clarity word list, the American KAY CSL4500, the Beijing Yangchen YF-16 computer speech analysis workstation, soundproof rooms, Wechsler scales of intelligence-fourth edition, and audiometers were used to evaluate the cleft-related lateral misarticulation. Statistical analysis was performed on the age, gender, error rate, corner of the mouth deviation direction, comorbidity, duration of intervention, period of treatment, and therapeutic effect of concentrated or normal intervention group in different patients. Our results showed that 2 to 3 straight stripes were visible at the onset of consonants /ti:/ /t'i:/, and 3 clear straight lines were visible in /tʂ/, indicating that the lateralized sound had 2 or 3 bursts and lasted for 1 to 2 ms. The onset age of lateralized sound was mostly below 12 years old. Chinese lateralized sound mainly occurred in vowel /i:/, and the occurrence rate of consonants with tongue surface /tɕ]/ /tɕ'/ /ɕ/ was the highest. In addition, the corner of the mouth deviation was also an indicator of lateralization sound, and other types of speech disorders mostly accompanied it. There was a significant difference in the improvement of speech clarity between the concentrated intervention group and the normal group before and after treatment. The 2 groups' average duration and course of treatment were not significantly different. Still, the period of concentrated intervention was shortened considerably, and the speech clarity of both groups of children after treatment exceeded 96%, reaching a normal level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".