Characterizing the mental health concerns of significant others of those with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) and how BPD impacts them
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a serious psychiatric condition characterized by emotional, interpersonal, and behavioral dysregulation. Significant others (SOs: family member, romantic partner, friend) of those with BPD also endorse elevated mental health concerns. The general severity of BPD symptoms, and/or severity of specific BPD dysregulation components (i.e., emotional, interpersonal, or behavioral) may uniquely influence distinct SO mental health concerns. However, which specific mental health concerns are experienced by SOs of those with BPD, and whether and how BPD influences them, remains unknown. This study therefore aimed to: (1) characterize the mental health concerns (i.e., depression, anxiety, trauma exposure and posttraumatic stress disorder, objective and subjective burden, behavioral dysregulation) of SOs of those with BPD; and (2) clarify whether and how overall BPD symptom severity, and specific BPD dysregulation components, are associated with these SO mental health concerns. Methods: SOs of those with BPD (N = 46) completed measures of mental health concerns, and informant-reports of their loved one with BPD's symptom severity at baseline, 1-, and 2-month follow-ups. Results: SOs exhibited low psychopathology across all mental health concerns, except anxiety severity, which was moderate. Higher overall BPD symptom severity, emotion dysregulation, and behavioral dysregulation, but not interpersonal dysregulation, in the person with BPD predicted worse SO mental health concerns. Discussion: Behavioral and emotional BPD symptom domains may be particularly deleterious to SO mental health, and BPD treatment providers may wish to consider referrals for SO mental healthcare in such instances.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".