MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399320822 · doi:10.1007/s12022-024-09813-4

The Clinicopathological Significance of Tumor Cell Subtyping in Appendiceal Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Series of 135 Tumors

2024· article· en· W4399320822 on OpenAlexaffabout
Özgür Mete, David W. Dodington, Daniel L. Shen, L. Sylvia

Bibliographic record

VenueEndocrine Pathology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreToronto General HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroendocrine tumorsAppendixCarcinoid tumorsPathologyImmunohistochemistryChromogranin ALymph nodePancreatic polypeptideCellProliferation indexMedicineBiologyInternal medicineGlucagon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are common and often are identified as incidental lesions at the time of appendectomy. The guidelines for management are based on tumor size, degree of invasion, and the Ki67 proliferation index. Most small bowel NETs are composed of serotonin-producing EC-cells, but there are multiple other neuroendocrine cell types. In the rectum, there are L-cell tumors that express peptide YY (PYY), glucagon-like peptides (GLPs), and pancreatic polypeptide (PP); they are thought to have a better prognosis than serotonin-producing tumors. We investigated whether the appendix has distinct neuroendocrine tumor types based on cell type and whether that distinction has clinical significance. We collected 135 appendiceal NETs from the pathology archives of UHN Toronto and UHCMC (Cleveland). We analyzed the expression of biomarkers including CDX2, SATB2, PSAP, serotonin, glucagon (that detects GLPs), PYY, and pancreatic polypeptide (PP) and correlated the results with clinicopathologic parameters. Immunohistochemistry identified three types of appendiceal NETs. There were 75 (56%) classified as EC-cell tumors and 37 (27%) classified as L-cell tumors; the remaining 23 (17%) expressed serotonin and one of the L-cell biomarkers and were classified as mixed. EC-cell tumors were significantly larger with more extensive invasion involving the muscularis propria, subserosa, and mesoappendix compared with L-cell tumors. Mixed tumors were intermediate in all of these parameters. Both EC-cell and mixed tumors had lymphatic and/or vascular invasion while L-cell tumors had none. Unlike EC-cell NETs, L-cell tumors were not associated with lymph node metastasis. Tumor type correlated with pT stage and the only patient with distant metastatic disease in this series had an EC-cell tumor. Our study confirms that appendiceal NETs are not a homogeneous tumor population. There are at least three types of appendiceal NET, including EC-cell, L-cell, and mixed tumors. This information is important for surveillance of patients, as monitoring urinary 5HIAA levels is only appropriate for patients with serotonin-producing tumors, whereas measurement of GLPs and/or PP is more appropriate for patients with L-cell tumors. Our data also show that tumor type is of significance with EC-cell tumors exhibiting the most aggressive behavior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEndocrine PathologySame topicNeuroendocrine Tumor Research AdvancesFrench-language works237,207