Impact of Real-Time Assessment of Pulse Oximetry on the 6-Min Walk Distance in Patients With Chronic Respiratory Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Continuous monitoring of pulse oximetry (S pO 2 ) is recommended during the 6-min walk test (6MWT) to ensure that the lowest S pO 2 is recorded. In this case, severe exercise-induced desaturation (EID; S pO 2 < 80%) triggers walking interruption by the examiner. Our main objective was to assess the impact of this approach on 6MWT distance in patients with chronic respiratory diseases and, second, to evaluate the safety of the test without interruption due to severe EID. METHODS: 6MWTs with continuous monitoring of S pO 2 were prospectively performed in subjects with chronic respiratory disease. The participants were randomly allocated to walk with or without S pO 2 real-time assessment. S pO 2 visualization during the test execution was available only in the first group, and walking interruption was requested by the examiner if S pO 2 < 80%. RESULTS: One hundred forty-five participants were included in each group (68.6% females, 62 [52–69] y old) without differences in demographic and resting lung function parameters between them. The main respiratory conditions were COPD ( n = 101), asthma ( n = 73), pulmonary hypertension ( n = 47), and interstitial lung disease ( n = 39). The walked distance was similar comparing groups (349.5 ± 117.5 m vs 351.2 ± 105.4 m). Twenty-five subjects presented with severe EID in the group with real-time S pO 2 assessment, and 20 subjects had severe EID in the group without real-time assessment respectively (overall prevalence of 15.5%). The 23 participants who had their test interrupted by the examiner due to severe EID in the first group (2 subjects stopped by themselves due to excessive symptoms) walked a shorter distance compared to the 11 subjects with severe EID without test interruption in the second group (9 subjects stopped by themselves due to excessive symptoms): 240.6 ± 100.2 m versus 345.9 ± 73.4 m. No exercise-related serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Interruption driven by severe EID reduced the walked distance during the 6MWT. No serious adverse event, in turn, was observed in subjects with severe desaturation without real-time S pO 2 assessment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".