Impact of prior anticancer treatments on palbociclib (PAL) clinical outcomes in patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC) in real-world settings.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1055 Background: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (eg, PAL) combined with endocrine therapy (ET) is a standard of care for patients with HR+/HER2− ABC. The impact of prior anticancer treatments on clinical outcomes of patients with HR+/HER− ABC treated with palbociclib in routine care is not well known and was investigated in the POLARIS study. Methods: POLARIS is a prospective, observational, multicenter, real-world study in the US and Canada. Enrolled patients were adults (≥ 18 y) with HR+/HER2− ABC who received PAL + ET as standard of care. Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS) were described by prior treatment. Results: A total of 1250 patients were enrolled. Median age was 64 years (range, 22–97), 67.9% had recurrent disease, and 72.1% received PAL as first-line treatment (1LOT) vs 27.9% as ≥ 2LOT. Prior anticancer therapies (1LOT: adjuvant/neoadjuvant setting; ≥ 2LOT: metastatic setting) were received by 912 patients (73.0%), which included ET-alone (n=254), chemotherapy-alone (n=235), chemotherapy + ET (n=338) or other (n=85). The median follow-up duration was 35.7 months for rwPFS and 39.1 months for OS. In 1LOT, both rwPFS and OS were numerically shorter for patients who received prior chemotherapy (either alone or with ET) when compared with patients who received ET-alone or had no prior therapy (Table). In ≥ 2LOT, patients who received prior chemotherapy-alone or ET-alone had comparable rwPFS, which was numerically longer than for patients with prior chemotherapy + ET; OS was comparable regardless of prior treatment. Conclusions: Overall, patients with HR+/HER2− ABC with prior chemotherapy receipt tended to have shorter clinical benefit. Regardless of LOT, numerically longer rwPFS was achieved in patients who received prior ET-alone. In 1LOT, OS was longer in patients who received prior ET-alone while in ≥ 2LOT, OS was comparable across prior treatment subgroups. Small sample sizes of some ≥ 2LOT subgroups as well as observational nature of the study may limit interpretation. [Table: see text]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".