Sequence Generation Completion Method and Resolution Scaling Network for Point Cloud Completion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Point cloud completion aims to predict the missing part for an incomplete 3D shape. Existing point cloud completion methods based on deep learning complete the point cloud by extracting global features from the incomplete point cloud. However, such methods cannot generate a uniformly distributed point cloud and the accurate structure details of the object. To solve the problem, a novel method for completing point clouds is proposed in this paper. Our approach is a two-step strategy. First, to predict the sparse point cloud with uniform density, the Sequence Generation Completion (SGC) method is proposed. By numbering the subspace obtained from the spatial subdivision, the point cloud is represented with a sequence of numbers and the point cloud completion problem is turned into a sequence generation problem. Second, to obtain the dense point cloud and generate the accurate structural details of point clouds, we propose a resolution scale network (RSN). This network takes local resolution as input and increases the weight of low-resolution regions by learning to preserve the comprehensive structural information of the sparse point cloud, which is crucial to generate dense point cloud. The comprehensive experiments on several public datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. Source code and pretrained models will be available at github.com/Pikachu-NCU/Sequence-Generate-Completion-Method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".