Structure-guided Evolutionary Analysis of Interactome Network Rewiring at Single Residue Resolution in Yeasts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are known to rewire extensively during evolution leading to lineage-specific and species-specific changes in molecular processes. However, the detailed molecular evolutionary mechanisms underlying interactome network rewiring are not well-understood. Here, we combine high-confidence PPI data, high-resolution three-dimensional structures of protein complexes, and homology-based structural annotation transfer to construct structurally-resolved interactome networks for the two yeasts S. cerevisiae and S. pombe. We then classify PPIs according to whether they are preserved or different between the two yeast species and compare site-specific evolutionary rates of interfacial versus non-interfacial residues for these different categories of PPIs. We find that residues in PPI interfaces evolve significantly more slowly than non-interfacial residues when using lineage-specific measures of evolutionary rate, but not when using non-lineage-specific measures. Furthermore, both lineage-specific and non-lineage-specific evolutionary rate measures can distinguish interfacial residues from non-interfacial residues for preserved PPIs between the two yeasts, but only the lineage-specific measure is appropriate for rewired PPIs. Finally, both lineage-specific and non-lineage-specific evolutionary rate measures are appropriate for elucidating structural determinants of protein evolution for residues outside of PPI interfaces. Overall, our results demonstrate that unlike tertiary structures of single proteins, PPIs and PPI interfaces can be highly volatile in their evolution, thus requiring the use of lineage-specific measures when studying their evolution. These results yield insight into the evolutionary design principles of PPIs and the mechanisms by which interactions are preserved or rewired between species, improving our understanding of the molecular evolution of PPIs and PPI interfaces at the residue level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".