Meta-Analysis on the Recovery Effect of Acupuncture Combined With Rehabilitation Therapy in Spinal Cord Injury Patients.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To explore the recovery effect of acupuncture combined with rehabilitation therapy on muscle spasms in patients with spinal cord injury through a systematic review of meta-analysis methods. Methods: Use "acupuncture," "electronic-acupuncture," "spinal cord," "spasm," and "paraplegia" as keywords, CNKI, Google, Wanfang, VIP, sci-hub, Web of Science, PubMed, and other Chinese or English databases were searched. To collect the domestic and foreign research on acupuncture combined with rehabilitation for muscle spasms in patients with spinal cord injury. Preliminary screening was conducted, and data extraction and quality evaluation were carried out on the included literature, including publication time, sample size, treatment methods, recovery effects, etc. According to the literature, the influence of acupuncture combined with rehabilitation therapy on muscle spasms in patients with spinal cord injury and related indices was analyzed. The search period was from January 2018 to June 2023, and the selected research results were tested by RevMan5.3 software and data consolidation for consistency. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Results: A preliminary literature search yielded 172 papers. 53 papers from sci-hub, 71 papers from HowNet, 36 papers from Wanfang, and 12 papers from VIP. Finally, 10 articles that met the criteria were included, including 594 patients. According to different treatment methods, the literature about acupuncture combined with rehabilitation therapy for muscle spasms in patients with spinal cord injury was analyzed for consistency, and data were merged. It was concluded that acupuncture combined with rehabilitation The clinical curative effect of the experimental group of patients is higher than that of the control group MD=5.31, 95%CI (2.94, 7.81), Z=5.64, P < .001; the clinical effective rate of the experimental group is higher than that of the control group. The improvement of the clinical spasticity index (CSI) score index of the patients in the experimental group was better than that of the control group MD = -3.09, 95%CI (-4.51, -1.67), Z =4.28, P < .001; the MAS score of the patients in the experimental group The improvement was better than that of the control group MD =-0.76, 95%CI (-1.16, -0.38), Z=8.13, P < .001; the improvement of Barthel index (BI) in the experimental group was better than that of the control group MD=9.81, 95%CI (7.84,11.71), Z=12.71, P < .001; no adverse events were reported in the experimental group and the control group. Conclusion: This study shows that acupuncture and rehabilitation are more effective than other therapeutic methods in the treatment of muscle spasms after spinal cord injury, and more randomized controlled trials are needed to verify this in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.021 | 0.042 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.019 | 0.054 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".