Resting State Functional Networks in Gliomas: Validation With Direct Electric Stimulation Using a New Tool for Planning Brain Resections
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Precise mapping of functional networks in patients with brain tumor is essential for tailoring personalized treatment strategies. Resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) offers an alternative to task-based fMRI, capable of capturing multiple networks within a single acquisition, without necessitating task engagement. This study demonstrates a strong concordance between preoperative rs-fMRI maps and the gold standard intraoperative direct electric stimulation (DES) mapping during awake surgery. METHODS: We conducted an analysis involving 28 patients with glioma who underwent awake surgery with DES mapping. A total of 100 DES recordings were collected to map sensorimotor (SMN), language (LANG), visual (VIS), and speech articulation cognitive domains. Preoperative rs-fMRI maps were generated using an updated version of the ReStNeuMap software, specifically designed for rs-fMRI data preprocessing and automatic detection of 7 resting-state networks (SMN, LANG, VIS, speech articulation, default mode, frontoparietal, and visuospatial). To evaluate the agreement between these networks and those mapped with invasive cortical mapping, we computed patient-specific distances between them and intraoperative DES recordings. RESULTS: Automatically detected preoperative functional networks exhibited excellent agreement with intraoperative DES recordings. When we spatially compared DES points with their corresponding networks, we found that SMN, VIS, and speech articulatory DES points fell within the corresponding network (median distance = 0 mm), whereas for LANG a median distance of 1.6 mm was reported. CONCLUSION: Our findings show the remarkable consistency between key functional networks mapped noninvasively using presurgical rs-fMRI and invasive cortical mapping. This evidence highlights the utility of rs-fMRI for personalized presurgical planning, particularly in scenarios where awake surgery with DES is not feasible to protect eloquent areas during tumor resection. We have made the updated tool for automated functional network estimation publicly available, facilitating broader utilization of rs-fMRI mapping in various clinical contexts, including presurgical planning, functional reorganization over follow-up periods, and informing future treatments such as radiotherapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".