Construction and validation of a nomogram prediction model for the progression to septic shock in elderly patients with urosepsis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Septic shock is a clinical syndrome characterized by the progression of sepsis to a severe stage. Elderly patients with urosepsis in the intensive care unit (ICU) are more likely to progress to septic shock. This study aimed to establish and validate a nomogram model for predicting the risk of progression to septic shock in elderly patients with urosepsis. Methods: We extracted data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV) and the eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD). The MIMIC-IV dataset was split into a training set for model development and an internal validation set to assess model performance. Further external validation was performed using a distinct dataset sourced from the eICU-CRD. Predictors were screened using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and multivariable logistic regression analyses. The evaluation of model performance included discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness. Results: The study demonstrated that the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), white blood count (WBC), platelet, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), calcium, albumin, congestive heart failure (CHF), and invasive ventilation were closely associated with septic shock in the training cohort. Nomogram prediction, utilizing eight parameters, demonstrated strong predictive accuracy with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.809 (95 % CI 0.786-0.834), 0.794 (95 % CI 0.756-0.831), and 0.723 (95 % CI 0.647-0.801) in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets, respectively. Additionally, the nomogram demonstrated a promising calibration performance and significant clinical usefulness in both the training and validation sets. Conclusion: The constructed nomogram is a reliable and practical tool for predicting the risk of progression to septic shock in elderly patients with urosepsis. Its implementation in clinical practice may enhance the early identification of high-risk patients, facilitate timely and targeted interventions to mitigate the risk of septic shock, and improve patient outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".