MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399369164 · doi:10.3138/ctr.197.014

<i>A Grown-Up’s Guide to Flying</i>

2024· article· en· W4399369164 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Vanessa Smythe, Mitchell Cushman, N. H. Bottomley

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAir Traffic Management and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtVisual artsAeronauticsArt historyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Grown-Up’s Guide to Flying is one of three standalone escape room-inspired experiences featured in Outside the March’s 2019 production of The Tape Escape. Set in a completely immersive, period-perfect 1990s’ video rental store in the former Annex location of Toronto’s iconic Queen Video, the piece is experienced through a series of narrative escape room-style puzzles hidden among 5,000-plus VHS rentals. The audience follows Kelly as he plans a birthday treasure hunt for his movie-loving younger sister, all while navigating how we experience movies—and each other—when our sighted experience changes. The story was designed to be experienced by a group of up to four people at a time and ran approximately forty-five minutes. It began, as each of the “rental experiences” in The Tape Escape did, with the group being handed a VHS tape with a sticker on it that read “Watch Me.” A video store staff member would then guide the group to one of the store’s “TV-VCR viewing stations” where the group could pop in the tape and watch what, in this case, appeared to be a birthday video message. This article includes production stills and a script excerpt written by creators Vanessa Smythe, Mitchell Cushman, and Nick Bottomley with consultation from Blindness scholar and artist Devon Healey.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score0.610

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1820.050

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre ReviewSame topicAir Traffic Management and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207