MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399370191 · doi:10.1088/2634-4505/ad546a

Mapping construction sector greenhouse gas emissions: a crucial step in sustainably meeting increasing housing demands

2024· article· en· W4399370191 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Hatzav Yoffe, Keagan Hudson Rankin, Chris Bachmann, I. Daniel Posen, Shoshanna Saxe

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Research Infrastructure and Sustainability · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of TorontoCement Association of Canada
KeywordsGreenhouse gasSustainabilityNatural resource economicsBusinessEnvironmental economicsEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental planningEnvironmental scienceEconomicsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper examines the tension between needing to build more infrastructure and housing and simultaneously reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) to avoid the most catastrophic impacts of climate change. This study uses an Environmentally Extended Input-Output approach to conduct a high-resolution top-down analysis of Canada’s national construction GHG emissions. Our findings highlight that Canada’s current construction practices cannot accommodate the construction required to restore housing affordability by 2030 without substantial environmental consequences. On a consumption life cycle basis, the construction sector was responsible for approximately 90 Mt CO 2 e in 2018, equivalent to over 8% of Canada’s total GHG emissions, while delivering less than a third of Canada’s annual housing needs. Residential construction was responsible for the largest share (42%) of total construction emissions. Overall, 84% of emissions are from material manufacturing and 35% of construction emissions are imported, underscoring the need for a comprehensive regulatory framework addressing both domestic and imported emissions. Under current construction practices (i.e. current material use patterns and emissions intensities), meeting Canada’s 2030 housing affordability and climate commitments requires an 83% reduction in GHG emissions per construction product (i.e. per home) compared to the 40% economy-wide reduction promised in Canada’s international reduction commitments. Mitigating the GHG gap between emission caps and housing demand calls for changes in the ratio of housing to other infrastructure (e.g. fewer roads, less fossil fuel infrastructure), new construction approaches (e.g. increasing material efficiency) and/or disproportionally allocating climate budget to construction. The implications of our study extend beyond Canada, offering valuable insights for other growing countries with climate goals. The results emphasize the urgency in considering and establishing sectoral GHG budgets for construction and for transformative changes in the construction sector to meet national GHG emission reduction commitments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Research Infrastructure and SustainabilitySame topicEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207