Safety and tolerability of durvalumab + carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by durvalumab ± olaparib in patients with newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) in the DUO-E/GOG-3041/ENGOT-EN10 trial.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
5599 Background: DUO-E (NCT04269200) showed statistically significant and clinically meaningful progression-free survival improvement with addition of durvalumab (D) to carboplatin/paclitaxel (CP) followed by D ± olaparib (O) vs CP alone for patients (pts) with EC (Westin SN et al. J Clin Oncol 2024;42:283–99). We describe safety and tolerability, focusing on the most common adverse events (AEs). Methods: Pts with newly diagnosed FIGO Stage III/IV or recurrent EC and naïve to systemic treatment were randomized 1:1:1 to CP (CP + D placebo [pbo; 6 cycles] followed by D pbo + O pbo), CP+D (CP + D [1120 mg IV q3w; 6 cycles] followed by D [1500 mg IV q4w] + O pbo), or CP+D+O (CP + D [6 cycles] followed by D + O [300 mg tablets bid]). Safety was assessed through AEs. Results: 709 pts (19.3% mismatch repair deficient [dMMR], 80.7% MMR proficient [pMMR]) received treatment (CP: n=236; CP+D: n=235; CP+D+O: n=238). Total median treatment duration with D/pbo was 9.0, 9.9 and 13.1 months in the CP, CP+D and CP+D+O arms and 5.7, 7.6 and 9.2 months withO/pbo, respectively. 18.6%, 20.9% and 24.4% of pts in the CP, CP+D and CP+D+O arm, respectively, had AEs leading to treatment discontinuations, 50.0%, 54.5% and 68.9% had AEs leading to dose interruptions, and 56.4%, 54.9% and 67.2% had grade ≥3 AEs. There was no increase in immune-mediated AEs or AEs of special interest for O with CP+D+O. There were 3 cases of pure red-cell aplasia with CP+D+O (all grade 3) and 3 of autoimmune hemolytic anemia (1 with CP+D, 2 with CP+D+O; all grade 3). The most common AEs were mostly low grade, with grade 3/4 in few pts (anemia [14%, 16%, 24% in the CP, CP+D, CP+D+O arms, respectively], alopecia [0%, 0%, 0%], nausea [1%, <1%, 3%], fatigue [2%, 2%, 2%]), and led to few treatment discontinuations and interruptions (Table). AE profiles were generally consistent across MMR subgroups. Conclusions: In DUO-E, safety findings were generally consistent with the known safety profiles of CP, D and O. The addition of D to CP followed by D or by D + O resulted in expected and manageable safety profiles compared with CP alone, with the most common AEs being low grade and leading to few discontinuations or dose modifications/interruptions of D/pbo or O/pbo. Clinical trial information: NCT04269200 . [Table: see text]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".