Dynamics of a cantilevered pipe conveying fluid and partially subjected to a confined counter-current external axial flow of a different fluid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A linear analytical model has been developed for prediction of fluid-elastic instabilities of brine-strings during product retrieval in salt-mined caverns. These caverns are utilized for storage and subsequent retrieval of hydrocarbons, hydrogen gas or compressed air in Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) plants. The retrieval operation involves pumping brine downwards through a long cantilevered pipe (“brine-string”) into the cavern, causing the lighter-than-brine gaseous or liquid “product” stored in the cavern to flow upwards and out of the cavern through a shorter annular passage formed by a concentric casing surrounding the upper portion of the pipe. The presence in the cavern of two different fluids with a variable interface level is taken into account. Employing a Newtonian derivation of the equation of motion solutions were obtained via the Galerkin modal decomposition technique, demonstrating that the brine-string may develop buckling or flutter at high-enough flow rates, depending on the system parameters. Extensive computations investigated the influence of system parameters on the dynamics. It is shown that simplifying the system by considering a single fluid in the cavern, and so for the flows within and around the brine-string, leads to unrealistically high critical flow velocity predictions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".