Prognostic implications of PSA levels at 7 months in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer treated with enzalutamide: Landmark analysis of ENZAMET (ANZUP 1304).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
5079 Background: ENZAMET (NCT02446405) showed that enzalutamide added to testosterone suppression (TS) with or without docetaxel improves overall survival (OS) compared with TS plus standard non-steroidal anti-androgen (NSAA) in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). We assessed PSA levels in ENZAMET participants at 7 months after randomization to determine correlations with OS. In CHAARTED, participants with mHSPC high volume disease (HV), 20% achieved PSA ≤ 0.2 with ADT (androgen deprivation therapy) alone versus 44% with low volume disease (LV) and for HV with ADT + Docetaxel, 36% achieved PSA ≤ 0.2 vs 64% with LV. Methods: Participants were included if they were followed for at least 7 months after randomization, and had availability of PSA and outcome data. Landmark analysis at 7 months used prognostic classifiers as previously identified in SWOG 9346 and CHAARTED of PSA ≤ 0.2 and > 0.2 at 7 months after initiation of therapy. Results: The total number of ENZAMET participants (pts) with PSA at 7 months of ≤0.2ng/mL was 646 of 1125 (57%): 271/562 (48%) in the NSAA arm versus 375/563 (67%) in the ENZA arm. Five-year OS for TS + NSAA (±Doc) arm PSA ≤ 0.2 = 71% vs PSA > 0.2 = 36% and for TS + ENZA (±Doc) arm PSA ≤ 0.2 = 74% vs PSA > 0.2 = 43%. The % of pts with PSA levels at 7 months ≤0.2ng/mL and corresponding 5-year OS outcomes by key prognostic groups (HV vs LV) ± docetaxel is shown (Table). In comparison with CHAARTED in those with HV, 37% achieved PSA ≤ 0.2 with ADT alone versus 61% with LV which increased to 55% for HV and 79% for LV respectively with addition of enzalutamide. In those with HV treated with ADT + D 39% achieved PSA ≤ 0.2 vs 58% with LV increasing to 60% for HV and 74% for LV respectively with addition of enzalutamide. Conclusions: A PSA nadir of ≤0.2 at 7 months is associated with a longer OS regardless of treatment and prognostic group (HV vs LV). Enzalutamide increased the rate of achievement of PSA <0.2 for all groups. Clinical trial information: NCT02446405 . [Table: see text]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".