Secondary cytoreduction followed by chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (SOC-1): A final overall survival analysis of a multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 3 trial.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
5520 Background: Surgery for platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer is widely practiced but has contradictory outcomes of survival in previously published studies. Methods: This multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 3 trial was performed in four primarily academic centers in China. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years old with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer and were predicted to have resectable disease according to the international model (iMODEL) combined with PET-CT, which was reported previously. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were the co-primary end points in hierarchical testing and planned for the final analysis of OS with a two-sided alpha of 0.05, when 209 deaths happened. Results: Between July 19, 2012 and June 3, 2019, 357 patients were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to receive surgery (182 pts.) or control (175 pts.). Median follow-up was 82.5 m. The median OS was 58.1 m in the surgery group and 52.1 m in the control group (hazard ratio [HR] for death, 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61 to 1.05; P=0.109). Overall, 61/175 (35%) patients in the control group crossed to surgery in subsequent therapies. A sensitive analysis showed that adjusted HR for death for crossover to surgery was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.58 to 0.99) (Table). When excluding the center with the highest crossover rate, secondary cytoreduction provided a 21.0-m benefit of overall survival over a control therapy. The highest crossover surgery rate was 49% in patients with 4-19 sites of relapse. The hazard ratio for death in patients with 1-19 sites was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.46 to 1.03). Patients with a complete resection had the most favorable outcome, with a median OS of 73 m. Median time to second subsequent therapy was 34.8 m vs 28.1 m (HR 0.68; 0.55-0.87). 24 of 182 (13.2%) patients remained relapse free and alive over 60 m in the surgery group, as compared with 5 of 175 (0.6%) patients in the control group. Conclusions: Secondary cytoreduction did not increase overall survival in the intention-to-treat population but led to a longer duration of overall survival when the crossover effect was taken into consideration. These findings are arguably clinically meaningful and support the efficacy of secondary cytoreduction in specialized centers and selected patients. ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT01611766. Res Sponsor: Shanghai Gynecologic Oncology Group. Clinical trial information: NCT01611766 . [Table: see text]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".