MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399421618 · doi:10.1016/j.chest.2024.05.012

Framework for Research Gaps in Pediatric Ventilator Liberation

2024· article· en· W4399421618 on OpenAlexaff
Samer Abu‐Sultaneh, Narayan P. Iyer, Analía Fernández, Lyvonne N. Tume, Martin C. J. Kneyber, Yolanda M. López‐Fernández, Guillaume Émériaud, Padmanabhan Ramnarayan, Robinder G. Khemani, Arun Baranwal, Bronagh Blackwood, Hannah J. Craven, Martha A. Q. Curley, Sandrine Essouri, José Roberto Fioretto, Michael Gaies, Sebastián González‐Dambrauskas, Silvia Hartmann, Justin Hotz, Philippe Jouvet, Steven Kwasi Korang, Christopher W. Mastropietro, Natalie Napolitano, Christopher J. L. Newth, Gerrard F. Rafferty, Louise Rose, Alexandre T. Rotta, David K. Werho, Elizabeth C. Whipple, Judith Ju‐Ming Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueCHEST Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Institutes of HealthNational Heart and Lung InstituteWellcome TrustChildren's Hospital Los AngelesSchool of Medicine, Indiana UniversityUniversity of Southern California
KeywordsLiberationClinical PracticeBest practiceMedicineIntensive care medicineNursingPolitical scienceLawChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.208
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.175
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2080.175
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.004
Bibliometrics0.0140.009
Science and technology studies0.0110.034
Scholarly communication0.0340.036
Open science0.0140.025
Research integrity0.0260.032
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCHEST JournalSame topicRespiratory Support and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207