Aqueous and Plasma Levels of Phosphorylated Tau 181 in Individuals with Normal Cognition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of p-tau181 have been associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD). The retina and vitreous have shown measurable quantities of phosphorylated tau 181 (p-tau181). The aqueous humor, which can be collected during cataract surgery, may have measurable concentrations of p-tau181. Objective: To determine whether p-tau181 is detectable in the aqueous humor and if so, whether it is associated with other measures that might be consistent with AD such as higher plasma p-tau181 concentration and lower Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-BLIND version 7.1) score. Methods: Aqueous humor samples, blood samples, and MoCA-BLIND scores were collected from patients who did not carry a clinical diagnosis of cognitive impairment at the time of cataract surgery. Aqueous p-tau181 concentrations and plasma p-tau181 concentrations were then measured using ultra-sensitive single-molecule assay ELISA technology. A rank-transformed mixed-effects multivariate regression model was used to determine associations between aqueous concentrations, plasma concentrations, and MoCA-BLIND scores. Results: 16 eyes of 16 participants were enrolled with an average age of 71.6. Average MoCA-BLIND score was 20.6/22, average aqueous p-tau181 concentration was 6.4 pg/mL, and average plasma p-tau181 concentration was 3.1 pg/mL. Higher plasma p-tau181 was significantly associated with higher aqueous p-tau181 (p = 0.02). Aqueous p-tau181 and plasma p-tau181 were negatively associated with MoCA-BLIND scores (p = 0.005 and p = 0.001 respectively) in these patients. Conclusions: Aqueous p-tau181 is positively correlated with plasma p-tau181 and is negatively correlated with MoCA-BLIND scores. Further study in individuals with mild cognitive impairment or AD characterized by cerebrospinal fluid and volumetric MRI metrics may yield further insights.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".