MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

How the Amount of Hartree-Fock Exchange Affects the Observation of the Pseudo Jahn-Teller Effect

2024· article· en· W4399431323 on OpenAlexaff
Steven M. Maley, Robert C. Mawhinney

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJahn–Teller effectHamiltonian (control theory)Density functional theoryHartree–Fock methodChemistryComputational chemistryHartreeBent molecular geometryPlanarElectronic structureQuantum mechanicsPhysicsMathematicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Heavy group 14 analogs of planar carbon molecules are well known to prefer bent or pyramidalized geometries. The pseudo Jahn-Teller effect (pJTE) is a general approach to understanding the origin of such molecular geometries. Computationally intensive multi-reference post Hartree-Fock methods are generally required to obtain values relevant to the pJTE. However, an alternative approach, using more computationally efficient density functional theory (DFT) and fitting a model vibronic Hamiltonian, can account for the pJTE parameters. Previous studies have detailed the effect of both integration grid size and exact exchange on various properties including the nature of stationary points (i.e., transition structure v. minimum) on potential energy surfaces but none have addressed the root cause of such discrepancies. In this work we examine two contentious stationary points belonging to planar disilene and 2Si TCNQ from the perspective of the pseudo Jahn-Teller effect (pJTE) using DFT methods. First the planar stationary points are characterized using a variety of model chemistries and integration grids. The effect of the amount of Hartree-Fock exchange is then studied and the usage of DFT for assessing pJT parameters is explored. It is shown that the DFT approach is a viable alternative for determining values relevant to the pJTE. A complementary cusp catastrophe theory approach to the problem is also introduced. Difficulties associated with the DFT-based approach to the study of the pJTE are discussed and changes in the electronic structure are explored using the Quantum Theory of Atoms in Molecules.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.271

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicCrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207