Divergent functional connectivity changes associated with white matter hyperintensities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Age-related white matter hyperintensities are a common feature and are known to be negatively associated with structural integrity, functional connectivity, and cognitive performance. However, this has yet to be fully understood mechanistically. We analyzed multiple MRI modalities acquired in 465 non-demented individuals from the Swedish BioFINDER study including 334 cognitively normal and 131 participants with mild cognitive impairment. White matter hyperintensities were automatically quantified using fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MRI and parameters from diffusion tensor imaging were estimated in major white matter fibre tracts. We calculated fMRI resting state-derived functional connectivity within and between predefined cortical regions structurally linked by the white matter tracts. How change in functional connectivity is affected by white matter lesions and related to cognition (in the form of executive function and processing speed) was explored. We examined the functional changes using a measure of sample entropy. As expected hyperintensities were associated with disrupted structural white matter integrity and were linked to reduced functional interregional lobar connectivity, which was related to decreased processing speed and executive function. Simultaneously, hyperintensities were also associated with increased intraregional functional connectivity, but only within the frontal lobe. This phenomenon was also associated with reduced cognitive performance. The increased connectivity was linked to increased entropy (reduced predictability and increased complexity) of the involved voxels' blood oxygenation level-dependent signal. Our findings expand our previous understanding of the impact of white matter hyperintensities on cognition by indicating novel mechanisms that may be important beyond this particular type of brain lesions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".