MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399460392 · doi:10.52381/icop2024.211.1

Utilizing spectral induced polarization to identify the ice core of a pingo: a case study in Haines Junction, Yukon, Canada

2024· report· en· W4399460392 on OpenAlexaffabout
Hosein Fereydooni, Stephan Gruber, Derek Cronmiller

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsYukon UniversityCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInduced polarizationElectrical resistivity and conductivityElectrical impedanceGeologyPolarization (electrochemistry)Phase angle (astronomy)Materials scienceMineralogyRemote sensingOpticsElectrical engineeringPhysicsChemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a field study conducted in Haines Junction, Yukon, utilizing Spectral Induced Polarization (SIP) to investigate the subsurface properties of a pingo site and specifically identify its ice core.The effectiveness of SIP analysis was demonstrated using a FUCHS frequency domain instrument, which measured electrical impedance magnitude and phase shift angle at multiple frequencies (1.46 Hz-40 kHz).The main focus of the analysis centered on the results obtained from electrical impedance magnitude and phase shift angle inversion at 40 kHz and 1.46 Hz.The inversion results revealed the presence of high resistivity layers within the subsurface, similar to results that would be expected with electrical resistivity tomography (ERT).Additionally, the SIP data revealed that some areas with high resistivity also had negative phase shift angle values, suggesting the presence of materials with polarizing properties.The analysis of the imaginary part of electrical impedance at 40 kHz for these areas highlighted the contribution of polarization, indicating the presence of ice.Furthermore, the electrical impedance magnitude at 1.46 Hz exhibited similarities to the 40 kHz analysis, but with higher resistivity.This pattern is another indicator of the presence of ice within the subsurface of the study area and was expressed using the Resistivity Frequency Effect (RFE) equation.The RFE analysis and the patterns of polarization confirmed the presence of the pingo ice core and identified its distinctive signature compared to other layers.Subsequent drilling confirmed the presence of interbedded ice and clay from 2.4-3.6 m depth and massive ice from 3.6-8.3m depth. 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.205
Threshold uncertainty score0.413

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207