The “Mental Health Crisis” and the Non-Being of the Mad
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In response to state-sanctioned police violence, movements like BLM and calls to “defund” or “abolish the police” suggest that funds currently used to fund the police would be better mobilized for “mental health services,” particularly for historically and presently minoritized peoples. Not only do these calls ignore the role mental “health” services play in neoliberal societies, but they also overlook the historical roots of psychiatry and the role it played in the systematic violence against civilians perpetrated by governments. The incarceration, sterilization, and, in extreme cases, killings of certain parts of a population were often justified in terms of protecting and strengthening the nation, and the productivity, efficiency, and defense of the community, the colony, and the military. Psychiatrists, nationally and internationally, were the “experts” who constructed “madness” and identified “invisible” (genetic) risks, rendering some men and women undesirable, unproductive, dangerous, and, in some cases, not worth living. Nowadays, the dominant discourse on psychiatry in Western societies is that the asylum is an institution of the past, and that we are living in an era of deinstitutionalization of psychiatric asylums. This discourse assumes that we have reached a point where the “mentally ill” have rights and are treated with dignity and exceptional measures are only deployed towards “patients” to protect them or others. The psychiatric system is supposed to help people in distress, but the reality is quite different. In short, psychiatry has always been linked to questions of the life and death of psychiatric patients, defining who was a/normal, which lives deserved to be lived, and which deserved to be forgotten or killed. In our contemporary societies, psychiatry's obsession with a/normality translates into the exclusion and systemic execution of parts of the population, defined as Blacks, Indigenous, the poor, people considered of deviant gender/sexuality, etc. The ontological position of the mad as “non-human” has been the basis of (and continues to legitimize) a scientific psychiatric biopolitical rationality, including the politics of death which infuses it.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.033 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".