MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399463146 · doi:10.34172/jmdc.1245

The effect of therapeutic communication based on Peplau’s model on body image and pain among cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy in the Parsian hospital of Shahrekord

2024· article· en· W4399463146 on OpenAlex
Shekoufeh Naderi Samani, Ali Hasanpour Dehkordi, Shahriar Salehi Tali

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Multidisciplinary Care · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMental Health and Well-being
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAttendanceMedicineIntervention (counseling)CancerData collectionPhysical therapyNursingInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<strong data-sider-select-id="49519784-2c27-4b4d-b919-598f0050425d">Background and aims: Cancer has significant effects on the lives of cancer patients and their families, so effective communication skills are an integral part of the process of caring. This study aims to investigate the effect of Peplau’s Therapeutic communication model on body image and pain among cancer patients. <strong data-sider-select-id="47ffa4b3-52f1-4a46-8a86-33b86483c98d">Methods: The present research is a quasi-experimental study conducted with the attendance of 64 cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy in Shahrekord Parsian Hospital in 2020-2021. First, the research units were selected purposefully and then randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. In the intervention group, Peplau’s nursing model was done in four stages individually. Data collection tools were a demographic survey questionnaire, McGill Pain Questionnaire, and Body Image Questionnaire (MBSRQ). The mean scores before, immediately after, and three months after were compared using SPPS version 24 software. <strong data-sider-select-id="c87564b0-9116-4d8d-b1e9-e0b413603ff4">Results: Before interfering, the results of the study indicated the standard deviation±mean of body image scores in control and intervention groups were respectively 204.81±2.79, 206 (217-75.187)+that were not significantly different from each other (<em data-sider-select-id="7a57abac-9d34-4448-a7c8-d65004028829">P≥0.568). Whereas these scores immediately and three months after had statistically significant differences from each other (<em data-sider-select-id="1cd191e6-3935-4a68-a4ad-2be044f3a5ad">P<0.01). The results also indicated that the Standard deviation±mean of pain scores in control and intervention groups were 59.56±0.793 and 58.25±0.627 were not significantly different (<em data-sider-select-id="0971eddb-b1cd-4771-b0ee-ba052e0bb29d">P≥0.248). However, these scores immediately and three months after had statistically significant differences from each other (<em data-sider-select-id="fbd0c1f3-1c7c-42d4-80f1-5cfcc00468f3">P<0.01). <strong data-sider-select-id="007900dd-2c76-4cf5-bc18-00860fb82ccd">Conclusion: The findings of this research showed that implementing Peplau’s theory can improve body image and decrease pain in patients. Due to this program’s effectiveness, low cost, and safety, it is recommended for consideration in the nursing care program

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.245
Threshold uncertainty score0.307

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it