MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399464293 · doi:10.55927/jambak.v3i1.7857

Internal and External Factors that Influence Non-Performing Financing in Sharia Commercial Banks

2024· article· en· W4399464293 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kurniasih Setya Anindita, Naelati Tubastuvi, Wida Purwidianti, Alfato Yusnar Kharismasyah

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Manajemen Bisnis Akuntansi dan Keuangan · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Finance and Communication
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapital adequacy ratioBusinessShariaInflation (cosmology)Sample (material)Quarter (Canadian coin)Islamic bankingFinanceOperating expenseCommercial bankFinancial systemIslamEconomicsProfit (economics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Problematic financing is reflected in Non-Performing Financing (NPF) because NPF is a parameter that can determine whether there is risky financing in Islamic banking. This research aims to determine the impact of Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), Operating Expenses and Operating Income (BOPO), inflation, and Bank Indonesia (BI) rates on Non-Performing Financing (NPF) in Sharia Commercial Banks in Indonesia. The data in this research uses secondary data. The population used is Sharia Commercial Banks registered with the Financial Services Authority (FSA) in 2018-2022. The sample used is the published report for the 2018-2022 quarter I-IV period. The research results show that BOPO has a positive and significant impact on NPF. Meanwhile, CAR, inflation, and BI rates have no significant impact on NPF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Manajemen Bisnis Akuntansi dan KeuanganSame topicIslamic Finance and CommunicationFrench-language works237,207