MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399465205 · doi:10.1186/s13007-024-01212-4

Exploring UAS-lidar as a sampling tool for satellite-based AGB estimations in the Miombo woodland of Zambia

2024· article· en· W4399465205 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Methods · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research FoundationNational Science and Technology CouncilInternational Development Research CentreUnited States Agency for International DevelopmentU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsSampling (signal processing)LidarSatelliteEnvironmental scienceRemote sensingWoodlandGeographyComputer scienceAstronomyPhysicsBiologyEcologyDetector

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract To date, only a limited number of studies have utilized remote sensing imagery to estimate aboveground biomass (AGB) in the Miombo ecoregion using wall-to-wall medium resolution optical satellite imagery (Sentinel-2 and Landsat), localized airborne light detection and ranging (lidar), or localized unmanned aerial systems (UAS) images. On the one hand, the optical satellite imagery is suitable for wall-to-wall coverage, but the AGB estimates based on such imagery lack precision for local or stand-level sustainable forest management and international reporting mechanisms. On the other hand, the AGB estimates based on airborne lidar and UAS imagery have the precision required for sustainable forest management at a local level and international reporting requirements but lack capacity for wall-to-wall coverage. Therefore, the main aim of this study was to investigate the use of UAS-lidar as a sampling tool for satellite-based AGB estimation in the Miombo woodlands of Zambia. In order to bridge the spatial data gap, this study employed a two-phase sampling approach, utilizing Sentinel-2 imagery, partial-coverage UAS-lidar data, and field plot data to estimate AGB in the 8094-hectare Miengwe Forest, Miombo Woodlands, Zambia, where UAS-lidar estimated AGB was used as reference data for estimating AGB using Sentinel-2 image metrics. The findings showed that utilizing UAS-lidar as reference data for predicting AGB using Sentinel-2 image metrics yielded superior results (Adj-R 2 = 0.70, RMSE = 27.97) than using direct field estimated AGB and Sentinel-2 image metrics (R 2 = 0.55, RMSE = 38.10). The quality of AGB estimates obtained from this approach, coupled with the ongoing advancement and cost-cutting of UAS-lidar technology as well as the continuous availability of wall-to-wall optical imagery such as Sentinel-2, provides much-needed direction for future forest structural attribute estimation for efficient management of the Miombo woodlands.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.817
Threshold uncertainty score0.266

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.175
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it