Deep learning based MA detection with modified ResNet-50
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A deep understanding of retinal images is used to identify vascular diseases, such as Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) in individuals who experience high blood sugar levels and high blood pressure. DR is a progressive disease that starts from minute red saccular out pouches on blood vessels known as Micro-Aneurysm (MA). DR can be cured by eradicating MA on the retina. Detecting microaneurysms (MAs) in retinal digital images is a challenging task due to various factors. These factors include the diverse sizes, shapes, levels of noise, and contrasts exhibited by the images found in the publicly available datasets for Diabetic Retinopathy (DR). Moreover, the limited number of labelled examples in these datasets and the inherent difficulty faced by deep learning algorithms in accurately identifying small objects in retinal digital images further contribute to the complexity involved in MA detection. Here proposing a Deep Learning based MA detection using modified ResNet-50 with a Support Vector Machine. The suggested approach was training, tuning, and evaluation, both qualitatively and quantitatively, using publicly available datasets like E-ophthaMA and DIARETDB1. The suggested approach demonstrates improved outcomes in terms of time efficiency and resource utilisation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it