MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399473806 · doi:10.23977/cpcs.2024.080105

Wireless Communication Base Station Location Selection and Network Optimization Based on Neural Network Algorithm

2024· article· en· W4399473806 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueComputing Performance and Communication systems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Sensor Networks and IoT
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBase stationComputer scienceSelection (genetic algorithm)Artificial neural networkComputer networkWireless networkWirelessBase transceiver stationBase (topology)Selection algorithmAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsKey distribution in wireless sensor networksMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Base station location selection and network optimization are critical to improving the performance of wireless communication networks in terms of latency reduction. To this end, the article proposes leveraging a convolutional neural network (CNN) to improve the accuracy of base station location selection and network latency reduction. The CNN method, based on a three-dimensional representation including signal strength data set, network topology data set, and transmission path data set, is used to select base station location and optimize the multihop relay network for latency reduction. The article presents a following method: location selection and network optimization for the wireless communication network. First, it collects the experimental data set of base station location selection and network optimization, and then uses the training data to train the CNN model to extract features. Once the training is done, the article further optimizes the network parameters and configurations, and ultimately obtains the optimal base station location and network configuration while minimizing network latency. As a result, simulation results indicate that the CNN model has remarkable performance in base station location selection, as well as in network optimization. In summary, the feature extraction and processing ability of CNN are powerful, enabling it to effectively capture factors leading to delay, hence improving the performance of base station location selection and network optimization. The article also demonstrates that the CNN model can be adjusted according to different environments and scenario settings through dynamic tuning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputing Performance and Communication systemsSame topicWireless Sensor Networks and IoTFrench-language works237,207