Electrostatic Control of Nonlinear Photonic-Crystal Polaritons in a Monolayer Semiconductor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Integration of 2D semiconductors with photonic crystal slabs provides an attractive approach to achieving strong light–matter coupling and exciton–polariton formation in a chip-compatible geometry. However, for the development of practical devices, it is crucial that polariton excitations are easily tunable and exhibit a strong nonlinear response. Here we study neutral and charged exciton–polaritons in an electrostatically gated photonic crystal slab with an embedded monolayer semiconductor MoSe 2 and experimentally demonstrate a novel approach to optical control based on polariton nonlinearity. We show that spatial modulation of the dielectric environment within the photonic crystal unit cell results in the formation of two distinct excitonic species with significantly different nonlinear responses of the corresponding charged exciton–polaritons under optical pumping. This behavior enables optical switching with ultrashort laser pulses and can be sensitively controlled via an electrostatic gate voltage. Our results open new avenues toward the development of active polaritonic devices in a compact chip-compatible implementation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".